I take my text from John Lennon’s best-selling solo performance.
I have probably overwearied my readers with my complaints about DAWSON. In my own defense, I have received feedback from other bloggers with not dissimilar criticisms. Nonetheless, I will try to keep this blog from becoming an endless gripe session, as these are neither edifying nor amusing. Neither does griping influence anyone who can effect an improvement; they just go into a defensive hedgehog, “consuming miles of red tape in the correctest forms of activity,” and convinced that everything is for the best in this best of all possible worlds.
But today I encounter one who seems to be a fellow-sufferer, albeit on the practitioner’s side, rather than the journalist’s.
I don’t know his/her name, but Ch J Maurice B (“Mighty Mo”) Foley tells the sorry tale in his accustomed laconic style.
“…counsel for respondent attempted to file an Entry of Appearance in the above-docketed matter. However, the underlying submission reflects no substantive content, instead suggesting a problem with the upload process.” Brad A. Governor, Docket No. 3788-20S, filed 1/25/21, Order, at p. 1.
One person’s frustrated upload is another’s frustrated download. Or search.
The failed filing is stricken, of course. And Charles Dickens’ Circumlocution Office goes on.
You must be logged in to post a comment.