I’d thought the Boss Hoss herds first stampeded by The Jersey Boys a round dozen years ago (see my blogpost “Penalty Kick,” 7/17/14) had finally quietened down to routine summary J motions for garden-variety Section 6662 chops in Dixieland Boondockeries.
But it seems the Boss Hoss stampede is ongoing. See STJ Diana L. (“Sidewalks of New York”) Leyden taking IRS to task in Alexander Shen & Allison Shen, Docket No. 3974-25, filed 2/18/25.
IRS is asserting a Section 6662(a) accuracy chop in this deficiency case. But the Boss Hoss has apparently bolted before IRS saddled up.
“If respondent wishes to continue to assert the accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a) in this case, he shall file a status report and attach thereto a Case History Transcript, a Note Transcript, if applicable, and any other relevant documents to demonstrate compliance with section 6751(b)(1). Alternatively, if respondent concludes that he did not comply with the requirement under section 6751(b)(1) with respect to the accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a), he should consider conceding that penalty and notify the Court by filing a status report.” Order, at p. 2.
And just in case IRS’ counsel has forgotten how to round up a Boss Hoss and document the hoofprint of same, STJ Di has a checklist.
“To show compliance with this provision, respondent must show (1) the identity of the individual who made the ‘initial determination,’ (2) an approval of the penalty ‘in writing,’ (3) the identity of the person giving approval and his or her status as the ‘immediate supervisor,’ and (4) evidence that the supervisory approval was obtained no later than the issuance to petitioners of the initial formal communication of proposed adjustments that includes penalties and provides the taxpayer the right to protest those proposed adjustments, such as a 30-day letter or Letter 525.” Order, at p.1. (Citations omitted).
No ride into the sunset for the Boss Hoss.