Attorney-at-Law

PETITION THOSE LETTERS?

In Uncategorized on 05/13/2026 at 17:48

Cases like Craig Bernier & Lynette Contreni Bernier, Docket No. 2196-26S, filed 5/13/26, are the daily gravel that comes to the Tax Court gold pan. The IRS sends form letters which addressees petition, even though none of same are deemed SNDs by Ch J Patrick J. (“Scholar Pat”) Urda or his colleagues. Hence the petitions are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

So the petitioners are out sixty Georges, and their frustration, acknowledged in the boilerplate order, goes unredressed.

But is there a hidden nugget in the grit at the bottom of the pan?

IRS acknowledges in its filing with Tax Court that no SND was issued as at the date of the order. That acknowledgement also fixes a locus for 3SOL and 6SOL. If at a later date the SOL issue arises, there is the statement and the order embodying it. See FRE 801(d)(2).

Has any reader any experience to share? What do you tell a client in these circumstances?

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.