In Uncategorized on 06/24/2021 at 12:51

The worker on extended assignment is like the turtle. He carries his home with him, “howe’er so far he roam.” Such is the story of Robert J. Sherman & Catherine Sherman, Docket No. 21094-17S, filed 6/24/21. Or rather, it’s Rob’s story.

Rob lives in one place, but for the year at issue, and more, works in another. Unlike the hero of my blogpost “I’m Stickin’ to th’ Union,” 9/21/11, Rob doesn’t seem to have a business affiliation with his hometown sufficient to keep it as his tax home.

Judge Buch: “The term ‘home” for these purposes means the location of a taxpayer’s principal place of employment, not the location of his personal residence. Generally, if the location of the taxpayer’s place of business changes for an extended period, so does his tax home. More specifically, if a person works in a location for more than one year, then that person is not treated as being temporarily away from home when at that location. Sec. 162(a) (flush language).” Transcript, at pp. 10-11. (Citations omitted).

Rob also got a flat per diem for his expenses from his employer, which he didn’t report for the year at issue. His substantiation was the usual back-of-the-envelope.

Another many-times-told tale. But note the word “generally” in Judge Buch’s off-the-bencher; there may be a business reason why your client needs his home to stay put while s/he wanders far and wide.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: