Attorney-at-Law

PETITIONER WITHOUT A NAME, CASE WITHOUT A NUMBER

In Uncategorized on 04/02/2021 at 16:12

I objected last month (not for the first time) to the new rule, apparently parthenogenesized by the Genius Baristas who brought us DAWSON, that if one document in a case is sealed, each and every part of the whole case is sealed.

So what price Rule 27? If it’s obsolete, it should be stricken from the Court rules. If it still has force, to what extent? Must one surry on down to the stoned soul picnic in the locked-down Glasshouse, and bang fruitlessly on the doors? Can one phone in requests for the unsealed documents via the fitty-cent, three-buck cap?

Or will we go back to the old system, which worked well for years?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: