Attorney-at-Law

UNREIMBURSED – BUT UNSUBSTANTIATED

In Uncategorized on 07/10/2019 at 16:22

No question that his employers never reimbursed Sunderam Krishnan, 2019 T. C. Sum. Op. 14, filed 7/10/19, for any “…relocation, rent, meals, telephone, internet, equipment, traveling, or commuting costs while he was working on contract projects for its clients.” 2019 T. C. Sum. Op. 14, at p. 4.

And Sun certainly worked in different places.

But his contacts with his uncle’s home in Santone were too tenuous to make it home, so STJ Panuthos finds Sun’s tax home was wherever he might be.

And Sun’s recordkeeping didn’t even come up to shoebox standards.

Sun’s bank records are sufficient, though, to get him cellphone and internet, as what he claims for business was far less than his total bills. And the 2009 liberation of cell and internet from the Section 274 straitjacket definitely helps.

Sun is an IT expert. Too bad he didn’t have the usual software to set up his records.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: